It’s not every day that you would associate the words ‘food diary’ with children and young people living on the streets.  After all to maintain one they would need food to begin with. Child Rights and You (CRY) volunteers, in their many years of working with children in situations of poverty, realised that the general public don’t really understand what hunger means for children. So volunteers met with children from various backgrounds like those living on the street, young people involved in begging, tribal children and those commonly termed vagrants, to understand more about hunger in measurable terms, through a measurement of the calories they ingest on a daily basis. 

Chronically hungry

Two-and-half-year-old Surjo Basfore lives with his five-year-old sister on Platform No 4 of the Kalyani Railway Station in Kolkata. Their combined earnings -- about Rs 20 to 25 a day -- are handed over to their father, who also begs for a living. Breakfast is about half a puri, which brother and sister share. Lunch is about two handfuls of dal and rice. They usually don’t get an evening snack. Dinner is about two more handfuls of dal and rice or one chapati. Doing the math is easy. The total calorie intake for both children put together is about 1,000 calories. Surviving usually on food thrown away by railway passengers, they face chronic starvation.  
They are too young to understand irony. But both children live within shouting distance of Kalyani’s Food Corporation of India (FCI) godowns which have store about 11,000 metric tonnes of foodgrains.

More than eating

A few years ago the Supreme Court said that foodgrain left to rot in India should be distributed to the poor. Children like six-year-old Vishal will never know. He starts his day with half-a-cup of tea and two biscuits bought by his mother from a pavement stall. Breakfast is one samosa-pav. Lunch is khichdi from a local charity, half of which he saves to eat in the late-afternoon. By night he’s really hungry again, which is when a small packet of fries is bought for Rs 5 – the only amount his mother can spare. Vishal’s recommended dietary intake should be about 1,715 calories. He barely makes 800. Food might be scarce but Vishal’s address is a posh one. He stays in the backyard slums of Mumbai’s Khar area known for its schools, shopping malls, hospitals and steep residential property prices. All it lacks is an anganwadi, which would have gone a long way to keep children like him fed.

Tribal and neglected

Six-year-old Dharma Pahariya and Sani Paharin, from the Godda district of Jharkhand, called the Santhal Pargana, have been eating only rice and salt twice a day. Their total calorie intake is a meagre 440 calories or about one-fourth of the 1,715 calories they should be eating.

Hailing from the Pahariya tribal community they live in a parched forest that has not seen enough rain in the last few years. Food is scarce. Malaria and Kala-Azar are still dreaded threats, as they were 200 years ago. Earlier this year, media reports on the spurt of Kala-Azar cases in tribal-dominated Boyarizore and Sundar Paharia blocks in the district, prompted the Godda health department to push the panic button. But little has improved.

Food is so much more than just filling stomachs. Both doctors and people who work with children state that nourishment gaps at this age will result in lifelong poor health. Such severely malnourished children will not have age-appropriate levels of development in terms of height, weight and cognitive development. 

For such children the options are rather limited. A local nutrition rehabilitation centre (NRC) in Majhgaon, near Satna in Madhya Pradesh, a Government of India programme, runs a 15-day ‘course’ to bring near-death cases of malnourishment back from the brink of death with a two-week injection of essential food. The centre admits and gives food to only infants, and not to older children or parents, making the entire effort rather pointless, given that usually entire settlements are dying of hunger. Media reports say that 10 children have succumbed to hunger over the last year in this area.

“The condition here is so bad that the food distributed by the neighbourhood anganwadi is brought back home by the children and shared with the entire family,” says Sasmita Jena from CRY. “And since the infants are small they are the last priority and are only breastfed by the mother.”

It wasn’t easy for the volunteers working on the project to gather the data. Satyajit, the volunteer from Kolkata, who documented Surja’s food diary, says, “Extreme poverty, poor health and malnourishment made Surja’s parents reluctant to participate in the project.”

There was a time when Oliver asked for more and changed the way literature viewed orphans forever. Hunger stalks every child who is poor, whether from tribal areas or urban pockets of poverty. India’s children in poverty might not all be orphans but they certainly need more, especially in terms of nourishment.  After all. stable economic growth can’t be sustained on a future that’s so hungry today.

(Paromita Pain is a senior reporter and sub-editor with The Hindu and its feature supplements Young World and NXg) 

 H ome
 I n the news
 S cience for everyday life
 E arth warriors
 O ne World
 E xpressions
 W hat people are talking about
 W hy people are talking about
 T he trouble with
 G ood ideas (for a better world)
 T en biggest environmental problems
 M essages from Little Earth
 D o It Yourself
 S torybook
 A lternatives
 C hangemakers
 F ind out for yourself
 
 
 A lternatives
Alternative energy

We need energy for everything we do. For our bodies the energy comes from food. But for everything else, like the machines we depend on for our transport, communications, entertainment and health, we need to produce energy. Though we normally use the word ‘produce’ the total amount of energy in the universe is, in a sense, fixed. So when we commonly speak of production, we mean the conversion of it from one form to another, usually in order to perform work.

The word energy is derived from the Greek ‘energos’, meaning work. At the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, human muscle provided 70% of the energy needed; the rest came from wind, sun and water.

The burning of coal provided most of the energy needed for the Industrial Revolution. This coal-burning actually released millions of years of stored energy made by plants from photosynthesis. These fossilised plants turned into coal and oil, hence the term ‘fossil fuel’. During the Industrial Revolution, thanks to coal, the total energy use by humans worldwide increased by a factor of five, while the discovery of oil and natural gas increased energy usage by another 16 times. These fossil fuels currently account for 86% of the world’s energy.

  • Crude oil accounts for 39% of global energy.
  • It is followed by coal, at 24%.
  • Then comes natural gas with 23%.

But it is the richest nations that use most of this energy. The United States alone, with just 3% of the world’s population consumes 25% of global energy, whereas 2 billion people, primarily in Africa and developing Asia, do not have access to fossil fuels and rely on wood as their sole source of energy.

The connection between energy use and poverty is quite clear. Access to cheap and plentiful fossil fuels has enabled the western, more industrialised world, to enjoy high standards of life, while lack of energy access has kept other countries in poverty. And because of this many countries are willing to do anything to keep their access to energy sources like oil and coal, including start and fight wars.

Many other problems are related to energy use. When one form of energy is converted into another to perform work, because of the inefficiency of our machines and the quality of our energy sources, only a portion is obtained as energy; the rest is given off as heat and waste gasses and ash. These waste products, especially the waste gasses, are a major factor in global warming. This, coupled with problems of availability, has lead to the search for other sources of power. But they are going to be difficult to find and many of them have their own environmental problems. And our dependence of fossil fuels -- most obviously in the case of oil to power cars and other forms of transport -- is going to be very hard to give up.

In India, many alternatives to fossil fuels exist and are regularly used. These range from high technology alternatives like nuclear power, which is used to generate electricity, to dried cow dung used for household heating and to cook food.

Wood
But of all the alternative sources of energy used in India and the rest of the developing world one of the most interesting is wood. People burn wood to heat their houses and keep warm. Compared to other sources, wood fire seems very basic and in some ways primitive. It was probably the first source of energy when man first evolved, and some people credit our understanding of managing fire as a first step in the process of civilisation. Yet even now, 70% of the world’s developing population relies on wood for its primary fuel. It is a fuel of poor or poorer people, those who cannot afford gas and electricity. (In most developed nations, wood accounts for less than 3% of total energy.)

Africa has the highest wood fuel use per capita, and wood provides over 45% of the continent’s energy needs. In some countries, notably Uganda, Rwanda and Tanzania, wood accounts for 80% of total energy.

In India, wood accounts for around 20–30% of the total energy consumption in the country. Most of this, 90% of the total quantity of wood, is used in the domestic sector, for cooking and heating water. Wood is also used at cremations, and in small hotels or eating places like dhabas.

The first thing that needs to be understood about wood is that although we speak of it as one thing it is actually quite varied and of different ‘economic’ types. Wood from larger trees is used as timber, for building and for making furniture. But this is valuable and too expensive to be burnt as firewood. It is mostly smaller tree branches, twigs, wood shavings, bark and roots, all which cannot be used elsewhere because they are of inferior quality, that are used for burning. Most of this kind of wood falls off trees or can be cut off without damaging the living tree itself, which continues to grow to provide more wood for burning later. Also used are cast-offs and waste material from sawmills and timber factories. Except for the time and energy required to collect and carry the wood home from the forest or sawmill, this energy source is free which is why poor people depend on it. People who live far away from electric power lines and roads depend on wood because they have no choice. In many cases, people who can collect wood because they live near or have access to a forest collect more than they need and sell the rest; even in these cases wood works out cheaper than other sources. This is especially true for urban poor people who may have access to other sources of energy if they can afford it, but prefer wood since it is much cheaper. Generally it has been found that when people get richer they move on to cooking with coal, kerosene, electricity, or liquid petroleum gas, all of which need to be bought.

Apart from its cheapness there are some other very positive things about using wood as fuel. Wood is renewable and if properly maintained can be self-sustaining. Although wood use as fuel has supposedly contributed to the degradation of forests, around two-thirds of wood used for fuel comes from non-forested areas. It needs very little physical or chemical inputs to make trees grow. Waste products like ash can be returned to the environment and helps maintain the soil. An advantage of wood is that it contributes much less greenhouse gases than fossil fuel.

But there are also problems with using wood. One of these is that people who are too poor to afford other forms of fuel are usually also too poor to afford proper ventilation for their homes or even stoves that are efficient. This leads to the waste gases from burning wood being a major cause of respiratory illnesses. A second problem stems from the fact that in most Indian rural communities it is generally women who collect wood, spending a lot of time roaming in the forests trying to collect enough to help their families survive. This adds on to the time women spend collecting fodder and water, meaning that when young, they are the ones who drop out of school to perform these time-consuming and occasionally dangerous chores, adding to the gap in education between men and women.