It’s not every day that you would associate the words ‘food diary’ with children and young people living on the streets.  After all to maintain one they would need food to begin with. Child Rights and You (CRY) volunteers, in their many years of working with children in situations of poverty, realised that the general public don’t really understand what hunger means for children. So volunteers met with children from various backgrounds like those living on the street, young people involved in begging, tribal children and those commonly termed vagrants, to understand more about hunger in measurable terms, through a measurement of the calories they ingest on a daily basis. 

Chronically hungry

Two-and-half-year-old Surjo Basfore lives with his five-year-old sister on Platform No 4 of the Kalyani Railway Station in Kolkata. Their combined earnings -- about Rs 20 to 25 a day -- are handed over to their father, who also begs for a living. Breakfast is about half a puri, which brother and sister share. Lunch is about two handfuls of dal and rice. They usually don’t get an evening snack. Dinner is about two more handfuls of dal and rice or one chapati. Doing the math is easy. The total calorie intake for both children put together is about 1,000 calories. Surviving usually on food thrown away by railway passengers, they face chronic starvation.  
They are too young to understand irony. But both children live within shouting distance of Kalyani’s Food Corporation of India (FCI) godowns which have store about 11,000 metric tonnes of foodgrains.

More than eating

A few years ago the Supreme Court said that foodgrain left to rot in India should be distributed to the poor. Children like six-year-old Vishal will never know. He starts his day with half-a-cup of tea and two biscuits bought by his mother from a pavement stall. Breakfast is one samosa-pav. Lunch is khichdi from a local charity, half of which he saves to eat in the late-afternoon. By night he’s really hungry again, which is when a small packet of fries is bought for Rs 5 – the only amount his mother can spare. Vishal’s recommended dietary intake should be about 1,715 calories. He barely makes 800. Food might be scarce but Vishal’s address is a posh one. He stays in the backyard slums of Mumbai’s Khar area known for its schools, shopping malls, hospitals and steep residential property prices. All it lacks is an anganwadi, which would have gone a long way to keep children like him fed.

Tribal and neglected

Six-year-old Dharma Pahariya and Sani Paharin, from the Godda district of Jharkhand, called the Santhal Pargana, have been eating only rice and salt twice a day. Their total calorie intake is a meagre 440 calories or about one-fourth of the 1,715 calories they should be eating.

Hailing from the Pahariya tribal community they live in a parched forest that has not seen enough rain in the last few years. Food is scarce. Malaria and Kala-Azar are still dreaded threats, as they were 200 years ago. Earlier this year, media reports on the spurt of Kala-Azar cases in tribal-dominated Boyarizore and Sundar Paharia blocks in the district, prompted the Godda health department to push the panic button. But little has improved.

Food is so much more than just filling stomachs. Both doctors and people who work with children state that nourishment gaps at this age will result in lifelong poor health. Such severely malnourished children will not have age-appropriate levels of development in terms of height, weight and cognitive development. 

For such children the options are rather limited. A local nutrition rehabilitation centre (NRC) in Majhgaon, near Satna in Madhya Pradesh, a Government of India programme, runs a 15-day ‘course’ to bring near-death cases of malnourishment back from the brink of death with a two-week injection of essential food. The centre admits and gives food to only infants, and not to older children or parents, making the entire effort rather pointless, given that usually entire settlements are dying of hunger. Media reports say that 10 children have succumbed to hunger over the last year in this area.

“The condition here is so bad that the food distributed by the neighbourhood anganwadi is brought back home by the children and shared with the entire family,” says Sasmita Jena from CRY. “And since the infants are small they are the last priority and are only breastfed by the mother.”

It wasn’t easy for the volunteers working on the project to gather the data. Satyajit, the volunteer from Kolkata, who documented Surja’s food diary, says, “Extreme poverty, poor health and malnourishment made Surja’s parents reluctant to participate in the project.”

There was a time when Oliver asked for more and changed the way literature viewed orphans forever. Hunger stalks every child who is poor, whether from tribal areas or urban pockets of poverty. India’s children in poverty might not all be orphans but they certainly need more, especially in terms of nourishment.  After all. stable economic growth can’t be sustained on a future that’s so hungry today.

(Paromita Pain is a senior reporter and sub-editor with The Hindu and its feature supplements Young World and NXg

 H ome
 I n the news
 S cience for everyday life
 E arth warriors
 O ne World
 E xpressions
 W hat people are talking about
 W hy people are talking about
 T he trouble with
 G ood ideas (for a better world)
 T en biggest environmental problems
 M essages from Little Earth
 D o It Yourself
 S torybook
 A lternatives
 C hangemakers
 F ind out for yourself
 
 
 S cience for everyday life
How much water do we really need? 

As temperatures continue to rise over the long summer months, so too do our thirst levels and we need to drink lots of water to avoid getting dehydrated.

No one really knows exactly how much water a person should drink, or actually needs, since it depends on how active the person is and what the climate is like. But one thing is certain: like all living things from the tiniest insect to the tallest tree, the human body is composed mostly of water. And we all need water to stay alive. In fact, water is more important to us than food -- you can go without food a lot longer than you can go without water. If you went even a day without taking in any water you would fall seriously ill.

Though it's difficult to estimate exactly how much water a person needs, it's important to have a general figure of individual water requirements for survival, for planning purposes. Everyone from architects to town planners to water engineers needs this information. It's also a useful figure to have to help decide if a place or people is 'water stressed', meaning they do not have access to enough water.

Recommended basic water requirements for human domestic needs

Purpose

Litres per person per day

Drinking water

5

Sanitation

20

Bathing

15

Food preparation and cooking

10

The figures give here were first calculated by a scientist called Peter Gleick, and this total of 50 litres is called a 'recommended' requirement since it is what is needed to lead a normal life, not what is biologically or medically needed. One's biological needs should in any case be less than this total, as, if you desperately need water, you may not be too concerned about bathing.

A lot of the five litres needed for drinking is often consumed not as water but as drinks such as milk, tea, soft drinks, etc

These figures throw up a couple of interesting points.

By sanitation we mean the amount of water required for flushing and washing after going to the toilet. It is interesting that this requirement is so high, higher than what is needed for anything else. This is partly because toilets use up a lot of water, and also because sanitation is so important. This importance is more easily recognised when the required water is not available. After all, the second largest killer of people the world over is still poor sanitation; in other words, lack of access to those 20 litres of clean water.

A second point is that though the amount of water required for cooking is included, what's not is the water needed to grow the food to be cooked. All the grain, fruit and vegetables we eat need water to grow, and the amount of this water far exceeds our basic water requirements. The amount would be even greater for meat-eaters as you would have to include water for the crops the animals eat as well as the water the animals drink

Now that we know how much water is needed, let's contrast this with how much water is available. Not just in our cities, which never seem to have enough water, but globally.

Our teachers teach us that we live on a 'blue planet'. And that there is actually more water than land on our planet. So, shouldn't there be more than enough water to meet everyone's basic needs?

The problem is that when we speak of water as a human need we are talking about fresh, clean water that's easily available to meet our requirements for personal survival and for agriculture. There really isn't that much of this water to go around.

Despite our perceptions of the earth being a water planet, only a fraction of the water is accessible for human use. Of the total volume of water on the planet (an estimated 1,386,000 cubic kilometres), most of it -- 75.5% -- is undrinkable unusable salt water found in the world's oceans and seas. Only what's left, around 2.5%, is fresh water. Of this again, most (69%) is locked up in the form of ice in glaciers up in the mountains or in the north and south polar regions. Again, unusable. So, only a little over 30% of that 2.5% can be used by people. Sorry, not quite: a large chunk of this water is deep underground, in fact most of this 30% is groundwater. The tiny bit that's left over, usually calculated at between .3-.7% of the total water on earth is what's left for all the human beings in the world to share. Not much, huh?

-- Manoj Nadkarni

InfoChange News & Features, May 2006

 
 
<%@ include file="science_life_link.htm"%>
&nb